HOME


GENERAL

TOP:   Do's & Don'ts
NEWS - DIVORCE
DCSS Incentive Prog Exposed
Family Court Gone Bad - The Fix
Divorce Scenarios - FAQ


ATTORNEY | JUDGES

ATTY & JUDGE NEWS

ATTORNEY'S

NAPA JUDGES
2014 (Elia Ortiz)

2014 (Monique Longhorne)
2012 - 2013 (Rodney Stone)
2010 - 2011 (Diane Price)
2009 (Mark Bossenecker)
2008 (Francisca Tisher)
Judge VS Commissioner?

COMPLAINT FILING:

Read First: Sample Letters
State Bar Sample Letters 2

Attorney State Bar
Attorney Complaint

Judge Performance CA
How to File Complaint
Judge Complaint PDF


FORMS | COURT

COURT CALENDER
FORMS - DIVORCE
NOM vs OSC?
EX-PARTIE


SUPPORT | CUSTODY

SUPPORT

SUPPORT FAQ?
Napa LCSS (Local DCSS)
COMPLAINT FILING DCSS
Dept.of Child Supp Serv (DCSS)
Vocational Evaluation
Child Support Calculator
Termination Child Support

CHILD CUSTODY

Child Custody
Children's Attorney
Psych Evaluation
Parental Alienation
Parental Alienation part 2
TV / Videos
Comments


NAPA COURT LINKS

Family Law - Overview
Court Calendar
Family Law Facilitator
Rules of Court

HARRASEMENT

RESTRAINING Order

MISC | TERMS

DIVORCE TERMS
DIVORCE LINKS


ABOUT THIS SITE
TERMS OF USE


 

NAPA FAMILY COURT


Marriage and Family Therapists
&
Custody Evaluations

Disclaimer:

  • As a reminder, materials and information on the Site is general in nature and are provided for informational purposes only. Nothing on the Site should be construed as legal advice or used as a substitute for legal advice
  • There may be other therapists in Napa that you may wish to consider that I have no knowledge of.

BEWARE - BIAS!!!   

    • Watch out if the therapist is used often by a particular law firm and or attorney.
    • There is a tendancy for that therapist to side with that firm! Remember that these therapists need clients and they may tend to side with a law firm and or attorney that sends them a lot of "Business". Be Warned!

License Search for Psychologist (incl. Reg. Psych. and Psychological Asst.) - Click Here
California Board of Psychology - Click Here
California Board of Psychology - Complaint Information - Click Here


Daniel Pickar, Ph.D. - Santa Rosa CA. - Watch out for this Doctor regarding evaluations with your children.
Learn More about Daniel Pickar - Click Here


  Doris Pick, Ph.D - Napa (Fox Pick & Associates): Ph: 257-2720
 • This information comes from a personal meeting with Dr. Pick and a Psychiatrists friend: Although I was unable to have her as the therapist due to what I believe is a conflict with Minor Council and this Therapist - It is my impression that Dr. Pick is there for the children and will not take BS from either parent. My impression is that if one parent is not focusing on the child but spending time putting down the other parent, she will immediately confront that parent. Dr. Pick came as the highest recommended therapist.

    Valerie Fox, Ph.D - Napa (Fox Pick & Associates): Ph: 257-2720
 • I'm told that Dr. Fox deals more with children with other related therapies, but in fairness, I don't have much information. I'm told that she is good though.

  Del Domezio, LCSW - Napa
 • He is a good decent man and I believe in his heart that he feels that children should be with both parents. The only concern that I would have are with high conflict cases (extreme cases) whereby a very strong commitment and stance is paramount to handle the case.

What if I disagree with the Evaluation report?


Custody Evaluation Examines Child Health And Safety:

- Costs typically range from $5,000 - $8,000 for a 730 Evaluation, not including Attorney costs.

A child's best interest should be at the heart of any divorce proceeding. Many courts suggest and require a child custody evaluation (730 Custody Evaluation) before issuing any ruling on a divorce if the parents can't reach an agreement. Evaluation proves very important in cases where abuse or negligence is involved. Courts don't like to completely cut off contact between parents and children if they can help it. But there are times when it's necessary. Evaluation is performed by a psychologist that helps determine the health, welfare and safety of children. They will make suggestions as to a course of action regarding the children that the courts will consider in the case.

Children usually benefit from spending time with both parents after a divorce. During a child custody evaluation, a psychologist can determine whether this is advisable for a particular divorce case. In divorces where there have been incidents of abuse or negligence, it may be determined that limited visitations are necessary. This may involve court ordered, supervised visits or even no parental rights whatsoever. By examining a psychologists report, a court can decide on actions that reflect what is best for the children involved in the case.

A child custody evaluation isn't always required for every case. However, if you plan on disputing visitation or seek full custody, it will likely be necessary. Before you decide to go into the process, you should prepare yourself. Evaluation may cost a great deal and combined with lawyer's fee, you could owe several thousand dollars. Make sure you're fighting for custody for all the right reasons. If the dispute can be resolved through mediation or with your spouse, it would be much better for everyone. If however you are using your children's custody as a pawn or revenge against a spouse then you should reconsider. It could end up costing you more than you could imagine.

There are usually tests and questioning involved in a child custody evaluation. It's good to be both emotionally and mentally prepared for the outcome. It's also a good idea to consider a long period of evaluation so that a well rounded picture of the family dynamic can be seen. Divorce is a difficult thing on everyone involved, but especially children. Make sure that you're doing what is best for your children and have their best interest at heart.

 


730 Custody Evaluation
Rule 5.225. Appointment requirements for child custody evaluators

In California, a child custody evaluation may be ordered under section 730 of the Evidence Code when expert evidence is needed to help the court, typically, to help the court determine the best parenting arrangement for the child.

A 730 custody evaluation, is an in-depth evaluation or investigation of the parties family, family dynamics, and the child's relationship with the parent's and caregivers, which generally includes psychological testing. The evaluation is carried out by a mental health professional, also known as a custody evaluator, who will provide the court with expert opinion as to what he/she believes would be the in the child's overall best interest.

California Evidence Code Section §730 states, "When it appears to the court, at any time before or during the trial of an action, that expert evidence is or may be required by the court or by any party to the action, the court on its own motion or on motion of any party may appoint one or more experts to investigate, to render a report as may be ordered by the court, and to testify as an expert at the trial of the action relative to the fact or matter as to which the expert evidence is or may be required. The court may fix the compensation for these services, if any, rendered by any person appointed under this section, in addition to any service as a witness, at the amount as seems reasonable to the court. Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit a person to perform any act for which a license is required unless the person holds the appropriate license to lawfully perform that act."

730 Evaluation: Overview

Child custody evaluations have become quite commonplace in the family courts, in order to find a parenting plan or custody arrangement, which is "in the best interest of the child" , when parents have been or are unable to do so. In California, a child custody evaluation may be ordered under California Evidence Code Section §730

However, there is much skepticism and growing criticism, concerns, and/or controversy in regards to the validity, accuracy, and/or quality of these evaluations and how they are conducted and the qualifications of those who are conducting them ("evaluators").

Let us educate ourselves on custody evaluations or 730 evaluations and also understand the controversies surrounding them and what one can do to prepare.

What is a 730 Evaluation?
In California, a child custody evaluation or "730 Evaluation", can be described as an in-depth study and investigation of the "family, it's members, and/or prospective members" and their relationship with the children. The evaluation is carried out by an "evaluator" with the intent of helping the court determine what custody, visitation, and/or parenting arrangement would be in the "best interest of the children."

The evaluation usually takes place over a period of time set out by the judge or evaluator (sometimes weeks and sometimes months) and includes a recommendation for what would be "in the best interests of the children" , which the court is inclined to adopt. The evaluator can be called into court to testify or be cross examined. The evaluator will then have to answer questions and explain to the judge the recommendations and sometimes will be ordered to conduct a further study into the matter.

In some counties, a " fast track evaluation ", also known as a "partial evaluation" or "mini-evaluation", can be ordered. It is referred to as a "fast track evaluation", "partial evaluation", or "mini evaluation" because it is less extensive than the typical evaluation. This may be requested to speed up things, or when the scope of the evaluation can be reduced such as when the court wants to know the answer to a particular question. It is essential to determine if a "mini-evaluation" is right for your situation because if there are any issues that are significant to your case that requires a more in-depth look or study, it would be highly unlikely this would surface or enough compelling evidence will be even examined in such a short period of time.

Under obligation to the court, at the end of the evaluation, the evaluator will submit their findings and recommendations to the judge prior to the hearing. In a full evaluation this is generally in the form of a written report and with a fast track evaluation this is often in the form of an oral report.

In legal terms, California Evidence Code Section §730 states:

When it appears to the court, at any time before or during the trial of an action, that expert evidence is or may be required by the court or by any party to the action, the court on its own motion or on motion of any party may appoint one or more experts to investigate, to render a report as may be ordered by the court, and to testify as an expert at the trial of the action relative to the fact or matter as to which the expert evidence is or may be required. The court may fix the compensation for these services, if any, rendered by any person appointed under this section, in addition to any service as a witness, at the amount as seems reasonable to the court. Nothing in this section shall be construed to permit a person to perform any act for which a license is required unless the person holds the appropriate license to lawfully perform that act.

^ top

What is involved in a 730 Evaluation?
In most cases, a 730 evaluation will consist of several interviews as well as psychological testing. Interviews are conducted with all adults involved with the child, including parents, stepparents and sometimes other relatives who have significant roles in the child's life. Psychological testing provides an additional source of information that cannot be obtained through interviews alone.
Some psychologists do their own psychological testing, while others will refer that portion of the evaluation to a professional who is experienced in psychological assessment. The testing is done to describe the personalities and family dynamics, and to find any potential mental health or parenting problems.
With very young children, interviews are conducted as play sessions. Young children can express themselves more clearly through the action of play, or play sessions, more so than through conversations. Play sessions are a common practice found in "play therapy" under the observance of a trained and licensed therapist.
Usually several interviews are necessary, especially those that involve the child. Since circumstantial factors (such as custody exchanges and adjustment time, moods, illness, etc.) can have temporary effects on ones behavior. Multiple interviews help differentiate between temporary oscillations in ones behavior and what are continuing personality traits and/or characteristics.
In special circumstances, a custody evaluation may involve visits to the home, often called a "home visit", and/or school. These are not always necessary and in some cases can be initiated by the request of one or both of the parents.
^ top
Why a 730 Evaluation?
A 730 evaluation usually arises when parties (parents) are unable to decide or do not see eye-to-eye on what each believes to be the best custody arrangement. One parent cannot simply go to court and present an individual side of the argument in hopes of a ruling in their favor. There must be evidence to support a position and a judge, not knowing the family, will depend on the opinion of an "evaluator" to describe the parties involved and the nature of their interaction.

^ top
How does a 730 Evaluation come about?
A 730 custody evaluation can come about or occur by the following methods:

  1. By "stipulation", or agreed to by the parties and their attorneys
  2. Requested by either party (parent) in a custody dispute, subject to approval by a judge
  3. Ordered by a judge
^ top
Who are the "Family, it's Members, and/or Prospective Members"?
The family is usually the blood family members such as the parents and child.
Other family members and individuals who have played a substantial role in the raising, nurturing, up bringing, and/or day-to-day activities of the children will also be of interest to the evaluator. For example, the children's grandparent(s), stepparent(s), uncle(s), aunt(s), etc.
Prospective members of the family or members that may potentially play a substantial role in the raising, nurturing, up bringing, and/or day-to-day activities of the children will also be of interest to the evaluator. For example, this may include a parent's fiancé/fianceé, girlfriend/boyfriend, etc.
^ top
Who is the "Evaluator"?
The custody evaluation is conducted by a qualified mental health professional. The qualifications include having the right training and experience set forth by the state. Qualified persons to conduct evaluations can include a licensed clinical psychologist, licensed psychiatrist, Marriage and Family Therapist (MFT), Marriage, Family, and Child Counselor (MFCC), or Licensed Clinical Social Worker (LCSW).
If there is any psychological testing to be done, and there usually is, the professional must be qualified to administer, score, and interpret the psychological test. This would usually be done by a psychologist rather than a psychiatrist because this is a normal part of a psychologists training.
  1. California Rules of Court Rule 5.220 - Court-ordered child custody evaluations. (.html)
  2. California Rules of Court Rule 5.225 - Education, experience, and training standards for court-appointed child custody investigators and evaluators. (.html)
  3. California Rules of Court Rule 5.215 - Domestic violence training standards for court-appointed child custody investigators and evaluators. (.html)
  4. California Family Code Section 3110-3118  (.html)
Regardless of the type of professional appointed to conduct the evaluation, that person is likely to be bound to certain business and professions codes and ethical standards.
In the case of psychologists, especially if they are members of the American Psychological Association (APA), they are bound to the Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct outlined and set forth by the American Psychological Association (APA).
As another example, a child custody evaluator who is licensed by the Medical Board of California, the Board of Psychology, or the Board of Behavioral Sciences shall be subject to disciplinary action by that board for unprofessional conduct, as defined in the licensing law applicable to that licensee.
  1. Ethical Principles of Psychologists and Code of Conduct  (.html)
  2. Guidelines for Child Custody Evaluations in Divorce Proceedings  (.html)
  3. California Business and Professions Code  (.html)
  4. Association of Family and Conciliation Courts (AFCC)  (.pdf)
^ top
How is the Evaluator selected?
A child custody Evaluator is most often selected or appointed to conduct an evaluation by one of the following methods listed below:
  1. The judge may chose the evaluator from a list the court maintains
  2. The judge will ask the parties to submit a list of acceptable evaluators from which he or she will choose
  3. With the help of the attorneys in the case who know various evaluators and their reputation in the community, the two sides will mutually agree on an evaluator
However, the selection process can become complicated and is often looked at by the attorneys as strategic. This is because some evaluators are considered to be "neutral" or unbiased, while others may be seen as pro-father or pro-mother. Some have gained a reputation for their thorough evaluations and others are looked at as too hasty, as some evaluators can take months to complete an evaluation, and some might finish in several weeks.
These considerations should and most likely will be weighed by the two sides, and play into the negotiations that may take place either between the two attorneys, or alternatively during a court hearing. Of course, each side hopes to get the evaluator who they believe will be in their favor, and that may prolong the selection process.
If you are a party to the proceedings and you get to have some say in the matter, it would be wise to get information and educate yourself about the evaluators you are considering. For instance, evaluators in most cases should be willing to provide a copy of their resume or curriculum vitae, to an attorney, which can give you the opportunity to learn more about them. Your attorney may also want to ask the evaluators some pertinent questions, thereby hopefully satisfying your needs and requests. For example, it may be of interest to ask the evaluator's view on joint-custody and if he/she believes that a Father is equally capable of raising and nurturing a child, even an a very young age (under 6 months old, under 12 months old).
^ top
What factors does an "Evaluator" consider in determining what he/she believes to be in the "child's best interest"?
The evaluation is supposed to determine what is in the overall "best interest of the child" ;. That is the golden rule in all jurisdictions in the United States, and it is supposed to serve as the premise for the judge's custody and/or visitation order and evaluators recommendation. However, what is and is not in the child's best interest is very subjective both from a legal and psychological perspective.
In order to answer the question of what is in the child's best interest , an evaluation will usually be carried out in several phases and over a period of time (which can be several weeks or several months). It is common, though not necessarily obligatory, that the evaluation process includes the following parts:
  1. Initial interview of each parent
  2. Observation of parents interaction with the child (often in the form of play sessions)
  3. Psychological testing (includes tests performed on both parents and the child)
  4. Interviews of third parties, such as family friends, teachers, therapists, counselors, and/or doctors.
  5. Observation of other family members and/or third parties and their interaction with the child (often in the form of play sessions)
  6. Review of reports and other information provided to or obtained by the evaluator
  7. Home visit
^ top
What happens after the Evaluation?
After completion of the evaluation, the evaluator writes up and submits a report to the court or judge and to the two attorneys representing the parents. This is usually done early enough before the hearing in which the report will be considered, giving the parties time to examine the report and to consider and/or make any necessary objections. (The time line is regulated and varies depending on the court rules and procedures in your jurisdiction).
If the report is acceptable to both parties, the parties can agree to accept it in its entirety into evidence. If there are disagreements, the parties will have a chance to argue their points in regards to the findings found in the report and challenge its recommendations.
Upon receiving the report, most judges give heavy weight and consideration to the recommendations and findings of the evaluator found and submitted in the report. Since the judge is the ultimate authority in making an order and not the evaluator, they can use their judicial discretion to give as much weight as they decide to the report when making a final order.
In considering the report, the judge is also likely to consider whether the data contained within the report is convincing and whether the evaluation was executed fairly. Also, consideration as to whether or not the data found in the report passes the measure of what would be considered "beyond reasonable doubt", a family law criteria. Other judicial considerations are whether the evaluator used acceptable methods, and whether their conclusions logically reflect the data in the report.

In addition, the judge will listen to and may consider any inconsistencies between the data in the report and other evidence brought to light in the case. Ultimately, in considering the report, the judge's decision must be based on the what is considered to be in the child's best interest .
^ top
What if I disagree with the Evaluation report?
If either of the parties (parents or attorneys) is not satisfied with the evaluation report, and its recommendations, they may depose the evaluator, and/or have the evaluator placed on the witness stand for cross-examination.
If one does challenge the evaluation report, it may be beneficial to seek out the opinion of an outside expert or mental health professional to review and critique the evaluation process and have this placed into a formal declaration written up by your attorney. Also, the expert will need to be prepared to be cross-examined at trial. The expert should evaluate the methods used by the evaluator, the conclusions drawn from the data, and the validity of the evaluators recommendations, and report their findings within the declaration.

2010 California Rules of Court

Rule 5.220. Court-ordered child custody evaluations

(a) Authority

This rule of court is adopted under Family Code sections 211 and 3117.

(Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007.)

(b) Purpose

Courts order child custody evaluations, investigations, and assessments to assist them in determining the health, safety, welfare, and best interest of children with regard to disputed custody and visitation issues. This rule governs both court-connected and private child custody evaluators appointed under Family Code section 3111, Evidence Code section 730, or Code of Civil Procedure section 2032.

(Subd (b) amended effective January 1, 2003.)

(c) Definitions

For purposes of this rule:

(1)A “child custody evaluator” is a court-appointed investigator as defined in Family Code section 3110.

(2)The “best interest of the child” is as defined in Family Code section 3011.

(3)A “child custody evaluation” is an expert investigation and analysis of the health, safety, welfare, and best interest of children with regard to disputed custody and visitation issues.

(4)A “full evaluation, investigation, or assessment” is a comprehensive examination of the health, safety, welfare, and best interest of the child.

(5)A “partial evaluation, investigation, or assessment” is an examination of the health, safety, welfare, and best interest of the child that is limited by court order in either time or scope.

(6)“Evaluation,” “investigation,” and “assessment” are synonymous.

(Subd (c) amended effective January 1, 2003.)

(d) Responsibility for evaluation services

(1)Each court must:

(A)Adopt a local rule by January 1, 2000, to:

(i)Implement this rule of court;

(ii)Determine whether a peremptory challenge to a court-appointed evaluator is allowed and when the challenge must be exercised. The rules must specify whether a family court services staff member, other county employee, a mental health professional, or all of them may be challenged;

(iii)Allow evaluators to petition the court to withdraw from a case;

(iv)Provide for acceptance of and response to complaints about an evaluator’s performance; and

(v)Address ex parte communications.

(B)Give the evaluator, before the evaluation begins, a copy of the court order that specifies:

(i)The appointment of the evaluator under Evidence Code section 730, Family Code section 3110, or Code of Civil Procedure 2032; and

(ii)The purpose and scope of the evaluation.

(C)Require child custody evaluators to adhere to the requirements of this rule.

(D)Determine and allocate between the parties any fees or costs of the evaluation.

(2)The child custody evaluator must:

(A)Consider the health, safety, welfare, and best interest of the child within the scope and purpose of the evaluation as defined by the court order;

(B)Strive to minimize the potential for psychological trauma to children during the evaluation process; and

(C)Include in the initial meeting with each child an age-appropriate explanation of the evaluation process, including limitations on the confidentiality of the process.

(Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2003.)

(e) Scope of evaluations

All evaluations must include:

(1)A written explanation of the process that clearly describes the:

(A)Purpose of the evaluation;

(B)Procedures used and the time required to gather and assess information and, if psychological tests will be used, the role of the results in confirming or questioning other information or previous conclusions;

(C)Scope and distribution of the evaluation report;

(D)Limitations on the confidentiality of the process; and

(E)Cost and payment responsibility for the evaluation.

(2)Data collection and analysis that are consistent with the requirements of Family Code section 3118; that allow the evaluator to observe and consider each party in comparable ways and to substantiate (from multiple sources when possible) interpretations and conclusions regarding each child’s developmental needs; the quality of attachment to each parent and that parent’s social environment; and reactions to the separation, divorce, or parental conflict. This process may include:

(A)Reviewing pertinent documents related to custody, including local police records;

(B)Observing parent-child interaction (unless contraindicated to protect the best interest of the child);

(C)Interviewing parents conjointly, individually, or both conjointly and individually (unless contraindicated in cases involving domestic violence), to assess:

(i)Capacity for setting age-appropriate limits and for understanding and responding to the child’s needs;

(ii)History of involvement in caring for the child;

(iii)Methods for working toward resolution of the child custody conflict;

(iv)History of child abuse, domestic violence, substance abuse, and psychiatric illness; and

(v)Psychological and social functioning;

(D)Conducting age-appropriate interviews and observation with the children, both parents, stepparents, step- and half-siblings conjointly, separately, or both conjointly and separately, unless contraindicated to protect the best interest of the child;

(E)Collecting relevant corroborating information or documents as permitted by law; and

(F)Consulting with other experts to develop information that is beyond the evaluator’s scope of practice or area of expertise.

(3)A written or oral presentation of findings that is consistent with Family Code section 3111, Family Code section 3118, or Evidence Code section 730. In any presentation of findings, the evaluator must:

(A)Summarize the data-gathering procedures, information sources, and time spent, and present all relevant information, including information that does not support the conclusions reached;

(B)Describe any limitations in the evaluation that result from unobtainable information, failure of a party to cooperate, or the circumstances of particular interviews;

(C)Only make a custody or visitation recommendation for a party who has been evaluated. This requirement does not preclude the evaluator from making an interim recommendation that is in the best interest of the child; and

(D)Provide clear, detailed recommendations that are consistent with the health, safety, welfare, and best interest of the child if making any recommendations to the court regarding a parenting plan.

(Subd (e) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2003, and July 1, 2003.)

(f) Cooperation with professionals in another jurisdiction

When one party resides in another jurisdiction, the custody evaluator may rely on another qualified neutral professional for assistance in gathering information. In order to ensure a thorough and comparably reliable out-of-jurisdiction evaluation, the evaluator must:

(1)Make a written request that includes, as appropriate:

(A)A copy of all relevant court orders;

(B)An outline of issues to be explored;

(C)A list of the individuals who must or may be contacted;

(D)A description of the necessary structure and setting for interviews;

(E)A statement as to whether a home visit is required;

(F)A request for relevant documents such as police records, school reports, or other document review; and

(G)A request that a written report be returned only to the evaluator and that no copies of the report be distributed to parties or attorneys;

(2)Provide instructions that limit the out-of-jurisdiction report to factual matters and behavioral observations rather than recommendations regarding the overall custody plan; and

(3)Attach and discuss the report provided by the professional in another jurisdiction in the evaluator’s final report.

(Subd (f) amended effective January 1, 2003.)

(g) Requirements for evaluator qualifications, training, continuing education, and experience

All child custody evaluators must meet the qualifications, training, and continuing education requirements specified in Family Code sections 1815, 1816, and 3111, and rules 5.225 and 5.230.

(Subd (g) amended effective January 1, 2004; previously amended effective July 1, 1999, and January 1, 2003.)

(h) Ethics

In performing an evaluation, the child custody evaluator must:

(1)Maintain objectivity, provide and gather balanced information for both parties, and control for bias;

(2)Protect the confidentiality of the parties and children in collateral contacts and not release information about the case to any individual except as authorized by the court or statute;

(3)Not offer any recommendations about a party unless that party has been evaluated directly or in consultation with another qualified neutral professional;

(4)Consider the health, safety, welfare, and best interest of the child in all phases of the process, including interviews with parents, extended family members, counsel for the child, and other interested parties or collateral contacts;

(5)Strive to maintain the confidential relationship between the child who is the subject of an evaluation and his or her treating psychotherapist;

(6)Operate within the limits of the evaluator’s training and experience and disclose any limitations or bias that would affect the evaluator’s ability to conduct the evaluation;

(7)Not pressure children to state a custodial preference;

(8)Inform the parties of the evaluator’s reporting requirements, including, but not limited to, suspected child abuse and neglect and threats to harm one’s self or another person;

(9)Not disclose any recommendations to the parties, their attorneys, or the attorney for the child before having gathered the information necessary to support the conclusion;

(10)Disclose to the court, parties, attorney for a party, and attorney for the child conflicts of interest or dual relationships; and not accept any appointment except by court order or the parties’ stipulation; and

(11)Be sensitive to the socioeconomic status, gender, race, ethnicity, cultural values, religion, family structures, and developmental characteristics of the parties.

(Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2003.)

(i) Service of the evaluation report

A Notice Regarding Confidentiality of Child Custody Evaluation Report (form FL-328) must be attached as the first page of the child custody evaluation report when a court-ordered child custody evaluation report is filed with the clerk of the court and served on the parties or their attorneys, and any counsel appointed for the child, to inform them of the confidential nature of the report and the potential consequences for the unwarranted disclosure of the report.

(Subd (i) adopted effective January 1, 2010.)

(j) Cost-effective procedures for cross-examination of evaluators

Each local court must develop procedures for expeditious and cost-effective cross-examination of evaluators, including, but not limited to, consideration of the following:

(1)Videoconferences;

(2)Telephone conferences;

(3)Audio or video examination; and

(4)Scheduling of appearances.

(Subd (j) relettered effective January 1, 2010; adopted as subd (i); previously amended effective January 1, 2003.)

Rule 5.220 amended effective January 1, 2010; adopted as rule 1257.3 effective January 1, 1999; previously amended and renumbered effective January 1, 2003; previously amended effective July 1, 1999, July 1, 2003, January 1, 2004, and January 1, 2007.


THIS WEBSITE and all of the materials and information on the Site is general in nature and are provided for informational purposes only.
Nothing on the Site should be construed as legal advice or used as a substitute for legal advice. The opinions stated in this site are based on personal experience.